Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.

Context Reflective writing is a popular tool to support the growth of reflective capacity in undergraduate medical learners. Its popularity stems from research suggesting that reflective capacity may lead to improvements in skills such as empathy, communication, collaboration and professionalism. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 49; no. 9; pp. 901 - 909
Autores principales: Moniz, Tracy, Arntfield, Shannon, Miller, Kristina, Lingard, Lorelei, Watling, Chris, Regehr, Glenn
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109836865&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109836865
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2015
      vid: 49
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109836865
        109076201
        10.1111/medu.12771
        NLM26296406
        109836865
      ppf: 901
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
      aug:
        au:
          Moniz, Tracy
          Arntfield, Shannon
          Miller, Kristina
          Lingard, Lorelei
          Watling, Chris
          Regehr, Glenn
        affil: Department of Communication Studies, Mount Saint Vincent University
      sug:
        subj:
          Student Performance Appraisal
          Reflection
          Writing
          Reliability and Validity
          Education, Medical
          Human
          Descriptive Statistics
          Coefficient alpha
          Interrater Reliability
          Scales
          Educational Measurement
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Correlation Coefficient
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Repeated Measures
          Canada
          Funding Source
      ab: Context Reflective writing is a popular tool to support the growth of reflective capacity in undergraduate medical learners. Its popularity stems from research suggesting that reflective capacity may lead to improvements in skills such as empathy, communication, collaboration and professionalism. This has led to assumptions that reflective writing can also serve as a tool for student assessment. However, evidence to support the reliability and validity of reflective writing as a meaningful assessment strategy is lacking. Methods Using a published instrument for measuring 'reflective capacity' (the Reflection Evaluation for Learners' Enhanced Competencies Tool [ REFLECT]), four trained raters independently scored four samples of writing from each of 107 undergraduate medical students to determine the reliability of reflective writing scores. REFLECT scores were then correlated with scores on a Year 4 objective structured clinical examination ( OSCE) and Year 2 multiple-choice question ( MCQ) examinations to examine, respectively, convergent and divergent validity. Results Across four writing samples, four-rater Cronbach's α-values ranged from 0.72 to 0.82, demonstrating reasonable inter-rater reliability with four raters using the REFLECT rubric. However, inter-sample reliability was fairly low (four-sample Cronbach's α = 0.54, single-sample intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.23), which suggests that performance on one reflective writing sample was not strongly indicative of performance on the next. Approximately 14 writing samples are required to achieve reasonable inter-sample reliability. The study found weak, non-significant correlations between reflective writing scores and both OSCE global scores ( r = 0.13) and MCQ examination scores ( r = 0.10), demonstrating a lack of relationship between reflective writing and these measures of performance. Conclusions Our findings suggest that to draw meaningful conclusions about reflective capacity as a stable construct in individuals requires 14 writing samples per student, each assessed by four or five raters. This calls into question the feasibility and utility of using reflective writing rigorously as an assessment tool in undergraduate medical education.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N