Divided attention enhances explicit but not implicit conceptual memory: an item-specific account of the attentional boost effect.
The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the counterintuitive finding that words encoded with to-be-responded targets in a divided-attention condition are remembered better than words encoded with distractors. Previous studies suggested that the ABE-related enhancement of verbal memory depends u...
| Publicado en: | Memory Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 170 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Feb2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=120493424&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 120493424 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09658211 BAY jtl: Memory issn: 09658211 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2017 vid: 25 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 120493424 10.1080/09658211.2016.1144769 120493424 ppf: 170 ppct: 6 formats: tig: atl: Divided attention enhances explicit but not implicit conceptual memory: an item-specific account of the attentional boost effect. aug: au: Spataro, Pietro Mulligan, Neil W. Bechi Gabrielli, Giulia Rossi-Arnaud, Clelia affil: Department of Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy sug: ab: The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the counterintuitive finding that words encoded with to-be-responded targets in a divided-attention condition are remembered better than words encoded with distractors. Previous studies suggested that the ABE-related enhancement of verbal memory depends upon the activation of abstract lexical representations. In the present study, we extend this hypothesis by embedding it in the context of a broader perspective, which proposes that divided attention in the ABE paradigm affects item-specific, but not relational, processing. To this purpose, we examined the ABE in the matched tasks of category-cued recall (CCRT: explicit memory) and category exemplar generation (CEGT: implicit memory). In addition, study time was varied (500, 1500 or 4000 ms), to further determine whether the attentional boost manipulation could influence late-phase elaborative processing. In agreement with the predictions of the item-specific account, the results showed that exemplars encoded with targets were recalled better than exemplars encoded with distractors in the CCRT, but not in the CEGT. Moreover, performance in the CCRT increased with study time, whereas the size of the ABE-related enhancement tended to decrease, further confirming that this effect hinges upon early phase encoding processes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|