The Clinical and Classroom Utility of the Inventory of Reading Occupations: An Assessment Tool of Children's Reading Participation.
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the initial clinical and classroom utility of the Inventory of Reading Occupations (IRO), a new tool to assess children's reading participation. Method: The study used phenomenological qualitative and descriptive methods. The participants included 3...
| Publicado en: | Open Journal of Occupational Therapy (OJOT) Vol. 6; no. 2; pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Spring2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129149235&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 129149235 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 21686408 HDL1 jtl: Open Journal of Occupational Therapy (OJOT) issn: 21686408 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2018 vid: 6 iid: 2 pid: 94241 pub: Open Journal of Occupational Therapy place: Kalamazoo, Michigan artinfo: ui: 129149235 129149235 129149235 10.15453/2168-6408.1440 129149235 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The Clinical and Classroom Utility of the Inventory of Reading Occupations: An Assessment Tool of Children's Reading Participation. aug: au: Grajo, Lenin Candler, Catherine affil: Columbia University Medical Center sug: subj: Learning Environment Reading Evaluation Human Child Qualitative Studies Phenomenological Research Occupational Therapists Speech-Language Pathologists Teachers Parents Interviews Data Analysis Software Child: 6-12 years ab: Background: The aim of this study was to determine the initial clinical and classroom utility of the Inventory of Reading Occupations (IRO), a new tool to assess children's reading participation. Method: The study used phenomenological qualitative and descriptive methods. The participants included 38 occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, classroom teachers, and parents who completed or reviewed responses of children on the IRO. To provide triangulation, 20 of the children who completed the IRO were interviewed. Data were thematically analyzed and then categorized using a central Strengths- Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats premise. Results: The majority of the participants indicated favorable response to the clinical and classroom utility of the tool. Common themes were (a) the IRO is a user-friendly and engaging assessment that allows students to reflect on their reading participation; (b) the IRO is more suitable for children who engage in more structured reading; (c) the IRO can be adapted for older children; and (d) there is a need to identify whether the IRO is better as a screening or a full assessment tool. Conclusion: The study provided useful perspectives on how the tool can be further improved as a measure of the reading participation of school-aged children. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|