The Effect of Medium on the Message: Paper-and-Pencil vs. Electronic Teacher Corrective Feedback.
In this study, we examined the nature of teacher Corrective Feedback (TCF) in Paper-And- Pencil and Electronic modes by exploring the form and purpose of TCF and the strategies used to mark errors in the writings of undergraduate EFL students. We also investigated possible differences between the tw...
| Publicado en: | Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 1703 - 1721 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Universiti Putra Malaysia
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=133744040&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 133744040 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01287702 TKQ jtl: Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities issn: 01287702 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2017 vid: 25 iid: 4 pid: 20751 pub: Universiti Putra Malaysia artinfo: ui: 133744040 ppf: 1703 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.5MB tig: atl: The Effect of Medium on the Message: Paper-and-Pencil vs. Electronic Teacher Corrective Feedback. aug: au: Rezaei, Maliheh Shokrpour, Nasrin affil: Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey English Language Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran su: Psychological feedback English as a foreign language Second language acquisition Teaching methods Computer assisted instruction sug: subj: Psychological feedback English as a foreign language Second language acquisition Teaching methods Computer assisted instruction keyword: electronic feedback (E-feedback) feedback types and strategies paper-and-pencil feedback (PAP) Teacher corrective feedback (TCF) ab: In this study, we examined the nature of teacher Corrective Feedback (TCF) in Paper-And- Pencil and Electronic modes by exploring the form and purpose of TCF and the strategies used to mark errors in the writings of undergraduate EFL students. We also investigated possible differences between the two modes. To this end, we randomly assigned the students to the control (PAP feedback) and experimental groups (E-feedback). Taking a mixed-method research design, we analysed data which included the first drafts of students' essays of the two groups in hard and soft copy forms. We used a modified version of Analytic Model for Corrective Feedback and Error Feedback Strategies profile to identify the nature of TCF. The results showed: a) higher percentage of E-feedback compared with PAP feedback; b) make a grammar/mechanics comment/question, statement, or imperative as the most frequently used feedback type in both groups; c) underline/circle/ highlight the errors and underline/circle/highlight and categorise the errors as the most frequent feedback strategies in the control and experimental group respectively; and d) significant differences in the nature of feedback between the two modes. The findings suggested the medium (mode) by which feedback was provided affected the nature of the message given to the students. The outcome of this study is useful for writing instructors. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities is the property of Universiti Putra Malaysia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities holder: Universiti Putra Malaysia dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|