To Whistleblow or Not to Whistleblow: Affective and Cognitive Differences in Reporting Peers and Advisors.

Traditional whistleblowing theories have purported that whistleblowers engage in a rational process in determining whether or not to blow the whistle on misconduct. However, stressors inherent to whistleblowing often impede rational thinking and act as a barrier to effective whistleblowing. The nega...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Publicado en:	Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 171 - 211
Autores principales:	McIntosh, Tristan, Higgs, Cory, Turner, Megan, Partlow, Paul, Connelly, Shane, Mumford, Michael D., Steele, Logan, MacDougall, Alexandra E.
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	Springer Nature Feb2019
Materias:	Whistleblowing & ethics Ethical decision making Behavior disorders Peers Consultants Emotions
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost