Implementing participation‐focused services: A study to develop the Method for using Audit and Feedback in Participation Implementation (MAPi).

Background: It is widely agreed that children's services should use participation‐focused practice, but that implementation is challenging. This paper describes a method for using audit and feedback, an evidence‐based knowledge translation strategy, to support implementation of participation‐focused...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Child: Care, Health & Development Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 37 - 46
Main Authors: Kolehmainen, Niina, Marshall, Joanne, Hislop, Jenni, Fayed, Nora, Kay, Diane, Ternent, Laura, Pennington, Lindsay
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141095066&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141095066
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03051862
        6NX
      jtl: Child: Care, Health & Development
      issn: 03051862
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141095066
        141095066
        141095066
        10.1111/cch.12723
        141095066
      ppf: 37
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Implementing participation‐focused services: A study to develop the Method for using Audit and Feedback in Participation Implementation (MAPi).
      aug:
        au:
          Kolehmainen, Niina
          Marshall, Joanne
          Hislop, Jenni
          Fayed, Nora
          Kay, Diane
          Ternent, Laura
          Pennington, Lindsay
        affil: Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Child Health Services
          Social Participation
          Professional Practice, Evidence-Based
          Audit
          Feedback
          Implementation Science
          Human
          Child
          Parents
          Personnel, Health Facility
          United Kingdom
          Random Sample
          Questionnaires
          Pilot Studies
          Conceptual Framework
          Program Implementation
          Program Development
          Descriptive Statistics
          Behavioral Changes
          Professional Boundaries
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Background: It is widely agreed that children's services should use participation‐focused practice, but that implementation is challenging. This paper describes a method for using audit and feedback, an evidence‐based knowledge translation strategy, to support implementation of participation‐focused practice in front‐line services, to identify barriers to implementation, and to enable international benchmarking of implementation and barriers. Method: Best‐practice guidelines for using audit and feedback were followed. For audit, participation‐focused practice was specified as clinicians' three observable behaviours: (a) targets participation outcomes; (b) involves child/parent in setting participation outcomes; and (c) measures progress towards participation outcomes. For barrier identification, the Theoretical Domains Framework Questionnaire (TDFQ) of known implementation barriers was used. A cycle of audit and barrier identification was piloted in three services (n = 25 clinicians) in a large U.K. healthcare trust. From each clinician, up to five randomly sampled case note sets were audited (total n = 122), and the clinicians were invited to complete the TDFQ. For feedback, data on the behaviours and barriers were shared visually and verbally with managers and clinicians to inform action planning. Results: A Method for using Audit and feedback for Participation implementation (MAPi) was developed. The MAPi audit template captured clinicians' practices: Clinicians targeted participation in 37/122 (30.3%) of the sampled cases; involved child/parent in 16/122 (13.1%); and measured progress in 24/122 (19.7%). Barriers identified from the TDFQ and fed back to managers and clinicians included clinicians' skills in participation‐focused behaviours (median = 3.00–5.00, interquartile range [IQR] = 2.25‐6.00), social processes (median = 4.00, IQR = 3.00–5.00), and behavioural regulation (median = 4.00–5.00, IQR = 3.00–6.00). Conclusions: MAPi provides a practical, off‐the‐shelf method for front‐line services to investigate and support their implementation of participation‐focused practice. Furthermore, as a shared, consistent template, MAPi provides a method for generating cumulative and comparable, across‐services evidence about levels and trends of implementation and about enduring barriers to implementation, to inform future implementation strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N