The Revised American Occupational Therapy Association Fieldwork Performance Evaluations: Evaluation of Content Validity—Part 1.

Importance: Occupational therapy education and practice has changed over time; however, items on the American Occupational Therapy Association's (AOTA's) Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs) for the Occupational Therapy Student (OTS) and Occupational Therapy Assistant Student (OTAS) have not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 74; no. 6; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Preissner, Katharine, Duke, Kathryn Bernice, Killian, Catherine, Ouyang, Rachel Luangdilok, Jarek, Eva D., Kottorp, Anders
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Occupational Therapy Association Nov/Dec200
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=147387209&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 147387209
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02729490
        44I
      jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy
      issn: 02729490
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov/Dec200
      vid: 74
      iid: 6
      pid: 6680
      pub: American Occupational Therapy Association
      place: North Bethesda, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        147387209
        147387209
        147387209
        10.5014/ajot.2020.044180
        147387209
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: The Revised American Occupational Therapy Association Fieldwork Performance Evaluations: Evaluation of Content Validity—Part 1.
      aug:
        au:
          Preissner, Katharine
          Duke, Kathryn Bernice
          Killian, Catherine
          Ouyang, Rachel Luangdilok
          Jarek, Eva D.
          Kottorp, Anders
        affil: Katharine Preissner, EdD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Clinical Professor and Academic Fieldwork Coordinator, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago
      sug:
        subj:
          American Occupational Therapy Association
          Students, Occupational Therapy
          Occupational Therapy Assistants
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Instrument Validation
          Content Validity
          Qualitative Studies
          Content Analysis
          Academic Medical Centers
          Field Studies
          Cognition
          Epistemology
          Purposive Sample
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Data Analysis Software
          Thematic Analysis
          Feedback
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Importance: Occupational therapy education and practice has changed over time; however, items on the American Occupational Therapy Association's (AOTA's) Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs) for the Occupational Therapy Student (OTS) and Occupational Therapy Assistant Student (OTAS) have not been updated in more than two decades. Objective: To explore evidence of validity in relation to test content of the revised FWPEs for the OTS and OTAS Design: A qualitative study using cognitive interviews was conducted to gather perspectives on the revised FWPEs, including updated items and a proposed rating scale. A content analysis approach was used to link patterns in responses to stable, meaningful constructs to further align and refine content of the tool before further validation. Setting: Fieldwork sites and academic settings. Participants: Eighteen fieldwork educators (FWEs) and academic fieldwork coordinators Results: Seven areas for refinement were identified: (1) relevance to a variety of practice settings, (2) overlapping and redundant items, (3) long item statements, (4) double- and triple-barreled item statements, (5) alignment between OTS and OTAS items, (6) further alignment with AOTA and Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education documents and contemporary practice, and (7) wording and features of the proposed rating scale. The findings guided revisions of FWPE content. Conclusions and Relevance: Cognitive interviewing was a critical step in refining the FWPE items to support content validity. The issues identified may not have been detected using traditional approaches to survey development and therefore were critical in maximizing the validity and usefulness of the final items, which will ultimately benefit fieldwork educators and students. What This Article Adds: This study resulted in refinements to FWPE items before the next step in the validation process, ultimately improving the final FWPE items. In addition, this article outlines a process that other researchers can use to validate similar tools.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N