Associations Between Repeating Patterning, Growing Patterning, and Numerical Ability: A Longitudinal Panel Study in 4‐ to 6‐Year Olds.
The present study aimed to analyze the direction of the associations between repeating patterning, growing patterning, and numerical ability. Participants were 410 children who were annually assessed on their repeating patterning, growing patterning, and numerical ability, at ages 4, 5, and 6 years...
| Publicado en: | Child Development Vol. 92; no. 4; pp. 1354 - 1369 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jul/Aug2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=151816977&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 151816977 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00093920 CDV jtl: Child Development issn: 00093920 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul/Aug2021 vid: 92 iid: 4 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 151816977 10.1111/cdev.13490 ppf: 1354 ppct: 15 formats: tig: atl: Associations Between Repeating Patterning, Growing Patterning, and Numerical Ability: A Longitudinal Panel Study in 4‐ to 6‐Year Olds. aug: au: Wijns, Nore Verschaffel, Lieven De Smedt, Bert Torbeyns, Joke affil: Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology Parenting and Special Education Research Unit su: Repetitive patterns (Decorative arts) Mathematical ability Longitudinal method Panel analysis Pattern perception sug: subj: Repetitive patterns (Decorative arts) Mathematical ability Longitudinal method Panel analysis Pattern perception ab: The present study aimed to analyze the direction of the associations between repeating patterning, growing patterning, and numerical ability. Participants were 410 children who were annually assessed on their repeating patterning, growing patterning, and numerical ability, at ages 4, 5, and 6 years (i.e., spring 2017, 2018, and 2019). A cross‐lagged panel model identified bidirectional associations between all three abilities from ages 4 to 5 years while taking into account spatial skills. From ages 5 to 6 years, both patterning abilities predicted later numerical ability, but the reverse was no longer true. Associations between performances on both pattern types also disappeared. Results highlight the unique associations between repeating patterning, growing patterning, and numerical ability, above spatial skills. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|