Humeanisms: metaphysical and epistemological.
Classic inductive skepticism–the epistemological claim that we have no good reason to believe that the unobserved resembles the observed–is plausibly everyone's lot, whether or not they embrace Hume's metaphysical claim that distinct existents are "entirely loose and separate". But contemporary advo...
| Published in: | Synthese Vol. 199; no. 1/2; pp. 905 - 926 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Dec2021
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |