Promoting student engagement in online collaborative writing through a student‐facing social learning analytics tool.

Background: Online Collaborative Writing (OCW) has been reported to be useful to improve writing quality in higher education. However, challenges emerge during the collaborative processes, mainly centering on how to sustain active interactions and communications in order to complete a high quality o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 192 - 209
Main Authors: Chen, Si, Ouyang, Fan, Jiao, Pengcheng
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2022
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=154497193&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 154497193
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2022
      vid: 38
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154497193
        152045296
        154497193
        154497193
        10.1111/jcal.12604
        154497193
      ppf: 192
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Promoting student engagement in online collaborative writing through a student‐facing social learning analytics tool.
      aug:
        au:
          Chen, Si
          Ouyang, Fan
          Jiao, Pengcheng
        affil: College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
      sug:
        subj:
          Writing
          Collaboration
          Online Education
          Student Attitudes
          Instrument Construction
          Instrument Validation
          Human
          Multimethod Studies
          Data Analytics
          Quantitative Studies
          Content Analysis
          Qualitative Studies
          Cognition
          Interpersonal Relations
          Analysis of Variance
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Background: Online Collaborative Writing (OCW) has been reported to be useful to improve writing quality in higher education. However, challenges emerge during the collaborative processes, mainly centering on how to sustain active interactions and communications in order to complete a high quality of writing. Objectives: Using the design‐based research, this research designs and implements a student‐facing SLA tool that integrates multi‐method analytics to present social interactions, writing topics, and topic connections and to empirically investigate the effects of this tool on student engagement during OCW. Methods: This research uses both quantitative content analysis, statistical analysis, and qualitative analysis to examine the effects of the SLA tool on students' social and cognitive engagement as well as students' perceptions about the usefulness and usability of this tool. Results and Conclusions: Results showed that the SLA tool improved students' social and cognitive engagement, and most students perceived that the SLA tool was useful for the OCW activity. Based on the findings, implications of tool development and pedagogical design are proposed to foster students' online collaborative writing quality. Lay Description: What is currently known about the this topic: Online collaborative writing has been widely adopted in higher education.It is difficult for students to sustain active engagement in OCW.Learning analytics implementations have potential to foster student engagement. What this paper adds: A student‐facing SLA tool was developed to visually demonstrate student engagement.The SLA tool improved students' social and cognitive engagement.Students perceived the SLA tool useful for improving collaborative writing. Implications for practitioners: Tool implications include visualized representation, feedback contextualization, and influence of social comparison.Pedagogical implications include metacognition competency, instructional feedback, and collaborative characteristics.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N