Development and Technical Adequacy of the District Capacity Assessment.
The purpose of this article is to describe the methods and results used to establish the district capacity assessment's (DCA) content validity, response process validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability. The DCA measures a district's ability to support school-le...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 87 - 99 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Apr2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=156053776&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 156053776 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10983007 5LU jtl: Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions issn: 10983007 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2022 vid: 24 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 156053776 156053776 156053776 10.1177/1098300721990911 156053776 ppf: 87 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: Development and Technical Adequacy of the District Capacity Assessment. aug: au: Ward, Caryn S. Harms, Anna L. St. Martin, Kim Cusumano, Dale Russell, Christine Horner, Robert H. affil: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA sug: subj: Community Health Services Implementation Science Public Health Human Test-Retest Reliability Program Development Program Implementation Program Evaluation School Health Services Content Validity Construct Validity Internal Consistency ab: The purpose of this article is to describe the methods and results used to establish the district capacity assessment's (DCA) content validity, response process validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability. The DCA measures a district's ability to support school-level implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Assessment results are then used to guide action planning. The DCA is grounded in the understanding that districts must develop knowledge and skills in the use of implementation science methods if they are to support successful use of an innovation. Specifically, three studies were conducted. The first study established the DCA's content validity, that is, the extent to which the DCA represents constructs comprising district-level implementation capacity. The second study established the DCA's internal structure, or the relationships among the items compared to the constructs being measured and how well the items measured the same construct. The third and final study assessed how the results of the DCA varied over time, thus establishing the instrument's test–retest reliability. District Implementation Teams, researchers, or facilitators who use the DCA can be confident that the assessment is founded on research drawing from implementation science practices and methods. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|