Comparing Coding Viewing and Recording Methods to Quantify Embedded Instruction Learning Trials.
The purpose of this study was to examine the comparability of counts of embedded instruction learning trials when different methods of viewing and recording direct behavioral observations were used. In 13 classrooms, while videotaping embedded instruction implementation for a larger randomized contr...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Early Intervention Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 353 - 371 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | forms research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159931385&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159931385 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10538151 0VW jtl: Journal of Early Intervention issn: 10538151 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 44 iid: 4 pid: 20732 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 159931385 154732768 159931385 159931385 10.1177/10538151211069528 159931385 ppf: 353 ppct: 18 formats: tig: atl: Comparing Coding Viewing and Recording Methods to Quantify Embedded Instruction Learning Trials. aug: au: Martin, Mackenzie K. Snyder, Patricia A. Reichow, Brian Bishop, Crystal D. affil: Anita Zucker Center for Excellence in Early Childhood Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA sug: subj: Coding Methods Computers and Computerization Videorecording Students with Disabilities Child Behavior Learning Human Descriptive Statistics T-Tests Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Funding Source Implementation Science Teachers Correlational Studies Correlation Coefficient Male Female Children with Disabilities Teachers Psychosocial Factors Adult Middle Age Feedback Clinical Assessment Tools Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: The purpose of this study was to examine the comparability of counts of embedded instruction learning trials when different methods of viewing and recording direct behavioral observations were used. In 13 classrooms, while videotaping embedded instruction implementation for a larger randomized controlled efficacy trial was occurring, teachers' implementation of trials was coded in situ using pencil-and-paper methods. Videos were later coded using computer-assisted methods. Dependent-samples t tests, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, and additional score agreement calculations were conducted. Statistically significant differences were found in the estimates of trial frequency. Correlational analyses showed positive and strong relationships between the coding methods. Coding agreement was higher across the entire observation versus during 10-min continuous event blocks. In situ coding took significantly less time than video coding. Results provide empirical evidence for the advantages and disadvantages of common viewing and recording methods for quantifying behavior as part of systematic observation systems. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: forms research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|