Critical Disciplinary Thinking and Curricular Design in Games.

This article details a large-scale curricular design project in creating and implementing an MS/PhD in "Critical Game Design." Curricular design and critical scholarship in the analysis and design of games are co-constitutive. Institutional structures build individual and institutional capacity, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Design Issues Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 88 - 105
Autores principales: Rouse, Rebecca, Malazita, James
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: MIT Press Winter2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161079404&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 161079404
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07479360
        DIU
      jtl: Design Issues
      issn: 07479360
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter2023
      vid: 39
      iid: 1
      pid: 776
      pub: MIT Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161079404
        10.1162/desi_a_00708
      ppf: 88
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 302KB
      tig:
        atl: Critical Disciplinary Thinking and Curricular Design in Games.
      aug:
        au:
          Rouse, Rebecca
          Malazita, James
      su:
        Critical thinking
        Design thinking
        Games
        Disinformation
        Critical analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Critical thinking
          Design thinking
          Games
          Disinformation
          Critical analysis
      keyword:
        Curriculum Design
        Game Design
        Games Studies
        Graduate Education
        Social Justice
      ab: This article details a large-scale curricular design project in creating and implementing an MS/PhD in "Critical Game Design." Curricular design and critical scholarship in the analysis and design of games are co-constitutive. Institutional structures build individual and institutional capacity, they legitimize scholarship, define boundaries of expertise, and contribute to imaginations of disciplinary purview. We reflect on what is at stake beyond the discipline itself in wider digital culture, particularly the spread of disinformation, related growth of anti-academic sentiment, and testing of the foundations of democracy. We examine our own complicity and articulate the space of the games classroom as a site of potential transformation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Design Issues is the property of MIT Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Design Issues
      holder: MIT Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N