Understanding of Spatial Correspondence Does Not Contribute to Representational Understanding: Evidence From the Model Room and False Belief Tasks.

We examine the long-standing claim that understanding relational correspondence is a general component of representational understanding. Two experiments with 175 preschool children located in Norwich, United Kingdom, examined the use of a scale model comparing performances on a "copy" task, measuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Developmental Psychology Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 976 - 987
Autores principales: Sayer, Catherine M., Doherty, Martin J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association May2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=163481730&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 163481730
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00121649
        DPS
      jtl: Developmental Psychology
      issn: 00121649
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 59
      iid: 5
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163481730
        10.1037/dev0001508
      ppf: 976
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Understanding of Spatial Correspondence Does Not Contribute to Representational Understanding: Evidence From the Model Room and False Belief Tasks.
      aug:
        au:
          Sayer, Catherine M.
          Doherty, Martin J.
        affil: School of Psychology, University of East Anglia
      su:
        United Kingdom
        Task performance
        Thought & thinking
        Comparative studies
        Statistical models
        Space perception
      sug:
        subj:
          Task performance
          United Kingdom
          Thought & thinking
          Comparative studies
          Statistical models
          Space perception
      keyword:
        false belief task
        model room task
        spatial correspondence
        theory of mind
        false belief task
        model room task
        spatial correspondence
        theory of mind
      ab: We examine the long-standing claim that understanding relational correspondence is a general component of representational understanding. Two experiments with 175 preschool children located in Norwich, United Kingdom, examined the use of a scale model comparing performances on a "copy" task, measuring abstract spatial arrangement ability, and the false belief task. Consistent with previous studies, younger children performed well in scale model trials when objects were unique (e.g., one cupboard) but poorly at distinguishing objects using spatial layout (one of three identical chairs). Performance was specifically associated with Copy task but not False Belief performance. Emphasizing the representational relation between the model and the room was ineffective. We find no evidence for understanding relational correspondence as a general component of representational understanding. Public Significance Statement: This study compares performance on a classic hiding game, using a room and its scale model, with preschool children's abstract spatial ability and understanding of mental representation. We found performance on the classic Model Room task only related to spatial abilities, potentially important in later science and mathematics education.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N