A metaphorical advantage for bilingual children? Understanding figurative meaning by L2 and L3 EFL learners.

This study compared school-aged monolingual and bilingual English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners in terms of understanding metaphors on recall, multiple-choice, and reasoning tasks. It also examined the relationship between cognitive capacity and understanding metaphors on different measures....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Child Language Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 339 - 359
Autores principales: ALIPOUR, Javad, RANJBAR, Maryam
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Mar2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:This study compared school-aged monolingual and bilingual English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners in terms of understanding metaphors on recall, multiple-choice, and reasoning tasks. It also examined the relationship between cognitive capacity and understanding metaphors on different measures. A hundred and thirty Persian–Turkish early bilinguals and 122 monolingual Persian-speaking EFL learners took three different tests of metaphor comprehension and the Figural Intersections Test, a test of cognitive capacity. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in terms of cognitive capacity and understanding metaphors on two of the tasks, though with a small effect size. Furthermore, there was a significant positive relationship between cognitive capacity and the scores on the multiple-choice and reasoning tests, but not the recall test. Results suggest that bilingual L3 learners have an edge in understanding metaphors, reflecting a cognitive advantage.