What does 'co‐production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects.

Co‐production is a collaborative way of working which emphasises the exchange of diverse forms of knowledge in an equal partnership for equal benefits. Co‐produced research is a key strategic aim of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Strategic Priorities Fund;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nutrition Bulletin Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 345 - 360
Autores principales: Shaw, Naomi, Hardman, Charlotte A., Boyle, Neil Bernard, Craven, Joanne, Dooley, John, Mead, Bethan R., Morgans, Lisa, Mumby, Hannah, Pettinger, Clare
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178994833&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178994833
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14719827
        F0S
      jtl: Nutrition Bulletin
      issn: 14719827
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 49
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178994833
        177829720
        178994833
        178994833
        10.1111/nbu.12690
        178994833
      ppf: 345
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: What does 'co‐production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects.
      aug:
        au:
          Shaw, Naomi
          Hardman, Charlotte A.
          Boyle, Neil Bernard
          Craven, Joanne
          Dooley, John
          Mead, Bethan R.
          Morgans, Lisa
          Mumby, Hannah
          Pettinger, Clare
        affil: School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Food Industry United Kingdom
          Food Supply
          Nutrition Policy
          Stakeholder Participation
          Human
          United Kingdom
          Exploratory Research
          Action Research
          Research Personnel
          Thematic Analysis
          Case Studies
          Collaboration
          Interpersonal Relations
          Knowledge
          Seminars and Workshops
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Co‐production is a collaborative way of working which emphasises the exchange of diverse forms of knowledge in an equal partnership for equal benefits. Co‐produced research is a key strategic aim of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Strategic Priorities Fund; this research programme brings together researchers, policymakers, industry and communities to create positive change in the way food is produced, accessed and consumed. However, more generally, there are diverse understandings of co‐production and a lack of consensus on what 'good practice' looks like. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and map examples of co‐production methods employed across the TUKFS programme. Two creative workshops (n = 15 participants), conversations with TUKFS researchers and stakeholders (n = 15), and systematic analysis of project documents were used to critically explore co‐production activities within six TUKFS projects. A range of co‐production activities were identified. Findings highlighted areas of 'messiness' and complexity, challenges associated with applying co‐production approaches and practical solutions. Four key shared principles for co‐production were identified: (1) Relationships: developing and maintaining reciprocity‐based partnerships; (2) Knowledge: recognising the contribution of diverse forms of expertise; (3) Power: considering power dynamics and addressing imbalances; and (4) Inclusivity: ensuring research is accessible to all who wish to participate. Opportunities for reflection and reflexivity were considered crucial across all these areas. Findings contribute important insights towards a shared conceptual understanding of co‐production for food system transformation research. This paper makes recommendations for researchers, practitioners, academic institutions and funders working in this area of research and practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N