(De)motivating Zero‐Performing Students With Negative Feedback: Does the Salience of Performance Information Matter?

Background: Providing students with information on their current performance could help them improve by stimulating their reflection, but negative feedback that saliently mirrors task‐related failure can harm motivation. In the context of automated scoring based on artificial intelligence, we explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 1 - 17
Autores principales: Steinbach, Marlene, Fleckenstein, Johanna, Kuklick, Livia, Meyer, Jennifer
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=186918266&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 186918266
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 41
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        186918266
        186918266
        186918266
        10.1111/jcal.70070
        186918266
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: (De)motivating Zero‐Performing Students With Negative Feedback: Does the Salience of Performance Information Matter?
      aug:
        au:
          Steinbach, Marlene
          Fleckenstein, Johanna
          Kuklick, Livia
          Meyer, Jennifer
        affil: Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Germany, Kiel, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Feedback
          Motivation
          Writing
          Academic Performance
          Self Concept
          Students, High School Psychosocial Factors
          Funding Source
          Germany
          Human
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Learning Environment
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Self Report
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Scales
          Coefficient alpha
          Questionnaires
          Algorithms
          Artificial Intelligence
          Double-Blind Studies
          Multiple Regression
          Models, Statistical
          Data Analysis Software
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Providing students with information on their current performance could help them improve by stimulating their reflection, but negative feedback that saliently mirrors task‐related failure can harm motivation. In the context of automated scoring based on artificial intelligence, we explored how feedback on written texts might be designed to be least detrimental for zero‐performing students who are likely to receive negative feedback frequently and might suffer from its motivational consequences. Objectives: This experiment set out to investigate whether making the negative performance information in automated feedback messages less salient reduces the potential threat of negative feedback for zero‐performing students' task‐specific self‐concept, intrinsic value, and performance. Methods: A sample of 105 (Mage = 13.97 years) zero‐performing students received negative feedback with either more or less salient performance information after completing an English writing task. We used regression analysis to examine pre–post effects and group differences in self‐concept, intrinsic value, and performance. Results and Conclusions: The analyses showed that zero‐performing students' performance improved but their self‐concept and intrinsic value declined over the course of two writing tasks, with feedback provided after the initial task. Contrary to expectations, our findings showed that students' task‐specific self‐concept and intrinsic value declined more in the condition with less salient performance information (i.e., without a red cross as a salient visual performance cue). Our findings highlight the motivational potential of performance information and are discussed in terms of the need for further research into how negative feedback can be designed to effectively motivate and support zero‐performing learners.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N