Task idiosyncratic deals and task interdependence: Effects on demand–ability fit and employee outcomes.

Task idiosyncratic deals (I‐deals) exemplify an employer and employee co‐creating job design approach. However, past literature has predominantly relied on social exchange mechanisms to explain their impact on employee behaviour, which may be insufficient in capturing the critical job‐related mechan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology Vol. 98; no. 3; pp. 1 - 25
Main Authors: Wang, Jie, Kim, Tae‐Yeol, Chen, Tingting, Liang, Yongyi, Lin, Summer Xiaoxia
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188298748&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 188298748
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09631798
        OOP
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology
      issn: 09631798
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2025
      vid: 98
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188298748
        188298748
        188298748
        10.1111/joop.70042
        188298748
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 24
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Task idiosyncratic deals and task interdependence: Effects on demand–ability fit and employee outcomes.
      aug:
        au:
          Wang, Jie
          Kim, Tae‐Yeol
          Chen, Tingting
          Liang, Yongyi
          Lin, Summer Xiaoxia
        affil: Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China
      sug:
        subj:
          Employer-Employee Relations
          Employee Attitudes
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Job Performance
          Interprofessional Relations
          Human
          China
          Supervisors and Supervision
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Path Analysis
          Analysis of Variance
          T-Tests
          Scales
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Task idiosyncratic deals (I‐deals) exemplify an employer and employee co‐creating job design approach. However, past literature has predominantly relied on social exchange mechanisms to explain their impact on employee behaviour, which may be insufficient in capturing the critical job‐related mechanisms underlying the effects of task I‐deals. We draw on person–environment (PE) fit theory to propose that demand–ability (DA) fit can enrich our understanding of the effect of task I‐deals on employee behaviour. To test this mechanism, we conducted two studies. One was a field survey collected from 468 employees and 107 supervisors across three time points. The other was a pre‐registered scenario‐based online experiment involving 400 full‐time employees. Through these two studies, we found that task I‐deals were positively related to job performance and voice behaviour, and DA fit mediated these positive relationships. In addition, task interdependence enhanced the positive effect of task I‐deals on DA fit. The overall moderated mediation model was also significant. These findings highlight the importance of task I‐deals as an alternative approach to job design beyond top‐down and bottom‐up job design approaches and underscore PE fit as a novel theoretical perspective for understanding the impact of task I‐deals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N