Are Teachers Addicted to AI? Analysing Factors Influencing Dependence on Generative AI Through the I‐PACE Model.

Background: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into education has revolutionised teaching practices, offering educators advanced tools for lesson planning, content creation, personalised learning and administrative automation. While AI enhances efficiency and instructional ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 1 - 17
Autores principales: Du, Yiran, Tang, Mi, Jia, Kunjie, Wang, Chenghao, Zou, Bin
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=191181626&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 191181626
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 42
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        191181626
        191181626
        191181626
        10.1002/jcal.70174
        191181626
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Are Teachers Addicted to AI? Analysing Factors Influencing Dependence on Generative AI Through the I‐PACE Model.
      aug:
        au:
          Du, Yiran
          Tang, Mi
          Jia, Kunjie
          Wang, Chenghao
          Zou, Bin
        affil: University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Teachers Psychosocial Factors
          Technology Addiction
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Artificial Intelligence, Generative Utilization
          Prediction Models
          Human
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Questionnaires
          Self-Efficacy
          Affect
          Emotional Regulation
          Cognition
          Positive Psychology
          Reinforcement (Psychology)
          Educational Technology
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Scales
          Descriptive Statistics
          Inferential Statistics
          Factor Analysis
          Structural Equation Modeling
          Reliability and Validity
          Internal Consistency
          Discriminant Validity
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Coefficient alpha
          Conceptual Framework
          Self Report
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into education has revolutionised teaching practices, offering educators advanced tools for lesson planning, content creation, personalised learning and administrative automation. While AI enhances efficiency and instructional effectiveness, concerns have emerged regarding teachers' potential overreliance on these technologies, leading to AI addiction. Objectives: This study applies the I‐PACE model (Interaction of Person‐Affect‐Cognition‐Execution) to explore the psychological and behavioural mechanisms underlying teachers' dependence on generative AI. Methods: Using survey data from 1750 teachers in Huanghua, China, the study examines factors such as self‐efficacy, need for cognition, mood regulation, positive affect, perceived usefulness and cognitive absorption in shaping AI addiction. Results: Findings indicate that cognitive absorption is the strongest predictor of AI dependence, while perceived usefulness, self‐efficacy and positive affect contribute indirectly through reinforcement mechanisms. Notably, mood regulation and need for cognition do not significantly influence AI addiction, suggesting that AI engagement in education is driven more by functional efficiency than emotional dependence. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of fostering mindful AI integration in teaching to prevent habitual overreliance. This study provides theoretical contributions by extending the I‐PACE model to the context of AI addiction in education and offers practical insights for educators, institutions and policymakers in promoting responsible AI use while maintaining teachers' professional autonomy and cognitive engagement. Practitioner Notes What is currently known about the subject matter: ○Generative AI has transformed education by improving teaching efficiency, lesson planning and content creation.○Teachers may become overly reliant on AI, leading to reduced engagement in independent decision‐making and problem‐solving.○Previous studies on digital addiction have focused on gaming and social media, with limited research on AI dependence in professional settings.What this paper adds: ○Demonstrates that cognitive absorption is the strongest predictor of AI addiction among teachers.○Finds that perceived usefulness, self‐efficacy and positive affect indirectly contribute to AI reliance, while mood regulation and need for cognition do not.○Expands the I‐PACE model to include AI addiction in education, offering new insights into behavioural and psychological mechanisms.Implications of study findings for practitioners: ○Teachers should be trained to use AI as a supportive tool rather than becoming dependent on it for instructional tasks.○Institutions should implement policies that encourage balanced AI integration while preserving teachers' autonomy.○Policymakers and AI developers should design AI tools that foster active teacher engagement rather than passive reliance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N