A brief systematic review of the single-case research on Prevent-Teach-Reinforce.
This systematic literature review synthesizes the single-case research on Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR). The purpose of the review was to evaluate the methodological quality, evidence, and descriptive characteristics of each included study. A systematic database search identified 12 studies that met...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Developmental Disabilities Vol. 72; no. 5; pp. 901 - 913 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195656542&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 195656542 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 20473869 F2SP jtl: International Journal of Developmental Disabilities issn: 20473869 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2026 vid: 72 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 195656542 178524332 195656542 195656542 10.1080/20473869.2024.2375456 195656542 ppf: 901 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A brief systematic review of the single-case research on Prevent-Teach-Reinforce. aug: au: Gregori, Emily Lory, Catharine Smith, Sandy Drew, Christine affil: University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA sug: subj: Behavioral Symptoms Therapy Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Program Evaluation Behavior Modification Human Systematic Review ERIC Database Psycinfo Social Behavior Task Performance and Analysis Emotional Regulation Interpersonal Relations Autism Spectrum Disorder Developmental Disabilities Patient Compliance ab: This systematic literature review synthesizes the single-case research on Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR). The purpose of the review was to evaluate the methodological quality, evidence, and descriptive characteristics of each included study. A systematic database search identified 12 studies that met inclusion for this review, including 21 unique experiments. Less than one quarter of the included experiments were shown to be methodologically rigorous based on the What Works Clearinghouse Version 5.0 standards. Of those experiments, most were shown to have strong or moderate evidence of efficacy for PTR on challenging and replacement behaviors. Major findings, limitations, and implications for practice are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|