"What's in a Name?": Institutional Critique, Writing Program Archives, and the Problem of Administrator Identity.
This article explores the general characteristics of each of the three basic orientations to the issue of administrator names. They include the overt-historical, covert-qualitative and hybrid-institutional orientation. Major strengths and weaknesses of each as approaches to administrator identity ar...
| Publicado en: | College English Vol. 71; no. 4; pp. 389 - 415 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
National Council of Teachers of English
Mar2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=39894677&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 39894677 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00100994 COE jtl: College English issn: 00100994 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2009 vid: 71 iid: 4 pid: 286 pub: National Council of Teachers of English artinfo: ui: 39894677 10.58680/ce20096985 ppf: 389 ppct: 26 formats: tig: atl: "What's in a Name?": Institutional Critique, Writing Program Archives, and the Problem of Administrator Identity. aug: au: Lamos, Steve affil: University of Colorado, Boulder su: Basic writing (Remedial education) Remedial English teaching Developmental studies programs Composition (Language arts) Language arts Writing processes Rhetoric Literary style English language education in universities & colleges sug: subj: Basic writing (Remedial education) Remedial English teaching Developmental studies programs Composition (Language arts) Language arts Writing processes Rhetoric Literary style English language education in universities & colleges ab: This article explores the general characteristics of each of the three basic orientations to the issue of administrator names. They include the overt-historical, covert-qualitative and hybrid-institutional orientation. Major strengths and weaknesses of each as approaches to administrator identity are examined. It also explains briefly why the author thought that the hybrid-institutional orientation might be a tool for archive-based institutional critique. It is concluded that the three orientations are points on a continuum rather than as completely distinct positions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|