The scientist-practitioner model in marriage and family therapy doctoral programs: current status.

We discuss the status of the scientist—practitioner model in marriage and family therapy (MFT) doctoral programs. Issues discussed include a lack of faculty research role models in doctoral programs, “farming out” the majority of research courses to other disciplines, problems with curriculum, and h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Marital & Family Therapy Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 75 - 84
Autores principales: Crane, D. Russell, Wampler, Karen S., Sprenkle, Douglas H.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell January 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507734010&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507734010
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0194472X
        JMF
      jtl: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy
      issn: 0194472X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 2002
      vid: 28
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507734010
        10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb01175.x
      ppf: 75
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 749KB
      tig:
        atl: The scientist-practitioner model in marriage and family therapy doctoral programs: current status.
      aug:
        au:
          Crane, D. Russell
          Wampler, Karen S.
          Sprenkle, Douglas H.
      su:
        Family psychotherapy
        Doctoral degree
        Education
      sug:
        subj:
          Family psychotherapy
          Doctoral degree
          Education
      ab: We discuss the status of the scientist—practitioner model in marriage and family therapy (MFT) doctoral programs. Issues discussed include a lack of faculty research role models in doctoral programs, “farming out” the majority of research courses to other disciplines, problems with curriculum, and how the culture of MFT does not support research. We also present suggestions for improving doctoral research training. The goal is to improve the quality of research training in doctoral programs. We hope that this will help change the culture of MFT to include research as one of its primary goals and greatest assets. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N