The Dynamics and Validity of the Group Selection Interview.
The authors examined the validity of the group interview, in which several applicants are interviewed simultaneously, vs. the traditional 1-on-l selection interview. The authors also investigated perceptions of fairness for each interview format and whether the order in which the applicant was asked...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 146; no. 2; pp. 183 - 202 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
April 2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The authors examined the validity of the group interview, in which several applicants are interviewed simultaneously, vs. the traditional 1-on-l selection interview. The authors also investigated perceptions of fairness for each interview format and whether the order in which the applicant was asked to respond in the group interview affected the quality of his or her response. Participants were 91 undergraduates who participated in 1-on-1 or group interviews for a scholarship award. The present results supported the hypothesis that interviewers in the 1-on-l format were significantly better at predicting the applicants' academic potential. Also, in the group interviews, the order in which the applicants were asked to respond affected the quality of their responses significantly. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. |
|---|