The Dynamics and Validity of the Group Selection Interview.

The authors examined the validity of the group interview, in which several applicants are interviewed simultaneously, vs. the traditional 1-on-l selection interview. The authors also investigated perceptions of fairness for each interview format and whether the order in which the applicant was asked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 146; no. 2; pp. 183 - 202
Autores principales: Tran, Timothy, Blackman, Melinda C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd April 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507878346&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507878346
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224545
        JSY
      jtl: Journal of Social Psychology
      issn: 00224545
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: April 2006
      vid: 146
      iid: 2
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507878346
        10.3200/SOCP.146.2.183-201
      ppf: 183
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 114KB
      tig:
        atl: The Dynamics and Validity of the Group Selection Interview.
      aug:
        au:
          Tran, Timothy
          Blackman, Melinda C.
      su:
        Social groups
        Interviewing
      sug:
        subj:
          Social groups
          Interviewing
      ab: The authors examined the validity of the group interview, in which several applicants are interviewed simultaneously, vs. the traditional 1-on-l selection interview. The authors also investigated perceptions of fairness for each interview format and whether the order in which the applicant was asked to respond in the group interview affected the quality of his or her response. Participants were 91 undergraduates who participated in 1-on-1 or group interviews for a scholarship award. The present results supported the hypothesis that interviewers in the 1-on-l format were significantly better at predicting the applicants' academic potential. Also, in the group interviews, the order in which the applicants were asked to respond affected the quality of their responses significantly. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N