Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number pocessing.

Participants performed same–different judgments for pairs of numerals in 2 conditions: numerical matching (responding “same” to pairs such as 2–TWO), or physical matching (responding “different” to pairs such as 2–TWO). In most cases, a distance effect was obtained, with the different responses be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition Vol. 21; pp. 314 - 327
Autores principales: Dehaene, Stanislas, Akhavein, Rokny
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association March 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508549898&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508549898
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02787393
        EXL
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
      issn: 02787393
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March 1995
      vid: 21
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508549898
        10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.314
      ppf: 314
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number pocessing.
      aug:
        au:
          Dehaene, Stanislas
          Akhavein, Rokny
      su:
        Number concept
        Human information processing
      sug:
        subj:
          Number concept
          Human information processing
      ab: Participants performed same–different judgments for pairs of numerals in 2 conditions: numerical matching (responding “same” to pairs such as 2–TWO), or physical matching (responding “different” to pairs such as 2–TWO). In most cases, a distance effect was obtained, with the different responses being slower when the 2 numbers were numerically close together (e.g., 1–2) than when they were further apart (e.g., 1–8). This indicates that numbers were automatically converted mentally into quantities, even when the participants had been told to attend exclusively to their physical characteristics. As postulated by several models of number processing, (e.g., Dehaene, 1992; McCloskey, 1992) Arabic and verbal numerals thus appear to converge toward a common semantic representation of quantities. However, the present results suggest that an asemantic transcoding route might allow for a direct mapping of Arabic and verbal numbers, perhaps by means of a common phonological representation. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N