Basic Processes in Reading: Can Functional Phonological Recoding Be Blocked?
A widely held view is that phonological processing is always involved in lexical access from print, and is automatic in that it cannot be prevented. This claim was assessed in the context of a priming paradigm. In Experiment 1, repetition priming was observed for both pseudohomophone-word pairs (e.g...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 148 - 159 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Canadian Psychological Association
June 2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510588619&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510588619 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 11961961 CJX jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology issn: 11961961 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: June 2006 vid: 60 iid: 2 pid: 98 pub: Canadian Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 510588619 10.1037/cjep2006014 ppf: 148 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 3.1MB tig: atl: Basic Processes in Reading: Can Functional Phonological Recoding Be Blocked? aug: au: Ferguson, Roy Besner, Derek su: Priming (Psychology) Phonology Reading level of students sug: subj: Priming (Psychology) Phonology Reading level of students ab: A widely held view is that phonological processing is always involved in lexical access from print, and is automatic in that it cannot be prevented. This claim was assessed in the context of a priming paradigm. In Experiment 1, repetition priming was observed for both pseudohomophone-word pairs (e.g., brane-brain) and morphologically related word pairs (e.g., marked-mark) in the context of lexical decision. In Experiment 2, subjects searched the prime for the presence of a target letter and then made a lexical decision to a subsequent letter string. Phonological priming from a pseudohomophone was eliminated following letter search of the prime, whereas morphological priming persisted. These results are inconsistent with the claim that a) lexical access from print requires preliminary phonological processing, and b) functional phonological processing cannot be blocked. They are, however, consistent with the conclusion that, for intact skilled readers, lexical access can be accomplished on the basis of orthographic processing alone, These results join a growing body of evidence supporting the claim that there exist numerous points in visual word recognition at which processing can be stopped. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|