Prejudiced learning: A connectionist account.

Connectionist simulation was employed to investigate processes that may underlie the relationships between prior expectancies or prejudices and the acquisition of attitudes, under conditions where learners can only discover the valence of attitude objects through directly experiencing them. We compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 100; no. 2; pp. 399 - 414
Main Authors: Eiser, J. Richard, Stafford, Tom, Fazio, Russell H.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell May 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510800267&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510800267
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2009
      vid: 100
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510800267
        10.1348/000712608X357849
      ppf: 399
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 970KB
      tig:
        atl: Prejudiced learning: A connectionist account.
      aug:
        au:
          Eiser, J. Richard
          Stafford, Tom
          Fazio, Russell H.
      su:
        Experiential learning
        Psychology of learning
        Prejudices
        Expectation (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Experiential learning
          Psychology of learning
          Prejudices
          Expectation (Psychology)
      ab: Connectionist simulation was employed to investigate processes that may underlie the relationships between prior expectancies or prejudices and the acquisition of attitudes, under conditions where learners can only discover the valence of attitude objects through directly experiencing them. We compared contexts analogous to learners holding either false negative expectancies (‘prejudices’) about a subclass of objects that were actually good or false positive expectancies about objects that were actually bad. We introduced expectancy-related bias either by altering the probability of approach, or by varying the rate of learning following experience with good or bad objects. Where feedback was contingent on approach, the false positive expectancies were corrected by experience, but negative prejudices resisted change, since the network avoided objects deemed to be bad, and so received less corrective feedback. These findings are discussed in relation to the effects of intergroup contact and expectancy-confirmation processes in reducing or sustaining prejudice. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N