Variation in compensation decisions by managers: an empirical investigation.

A study was conducted to examine variation in pay allocation decisions of managers. A policy-capturing approach was used to investigate 3,104 of these decisions made by 97 managers working for a large nonprofit organization with a pay-for-performance policy. It was found that managerial pay alloca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Psychology Vol. 128; pp. 41 - 51
Autores principales: Deshpande, Satish P., Joseph, Jacob
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd January 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512362179&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512362179
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223980
        JPY
      jtl: Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00223980
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 1994
      vid: 128
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512362179
        10.1080/00223980.1994.9712710
      ppf: 41
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Variation in compensation decisions by managers: an empirical investigation.
      aug:
        au:
          Deshpande, Satish P.
          Joseph, Jacob
      su:
        Decision making
        Pay for performance
      sug:
        subj:
          Decision making
          Pay for performance
      ab: A study was conducted to examine variation in pay allocation decisions of managers. A policy-capturing approach was used to investigate 3,104 of these decisions made by 97 managers working for a large nonprofit organization with a pay-for-performance policy. It was found that managerial pay allocations were significantly affected by subordinates' performance, the consistency in subordinates' past job performance, the importance of the subordinates' jobs in meeting managerial goals, and the degree of disruption that would occur if subordinates left their jobs. A large proportion of the variance across the managers was accounted for by sampling error and criterion unreliability. The raters' explicit rankings of the four subordinate-related factors did not correspond highly with the rankings of their regression weights.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N