Public Philosophy of Technology: Motivations, Barriers, and Reforms.

Philosophers of technology are not playing the public role that our own theoretical perspectives motivate us to take. A great variety of theories and perspectives within philosophy of technology, including those of Marcuse, Feenberg, Borgmann, Ihde, Michelfelder, Bush, Winner, Latour, and Verbeek, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 179 - 201
Autores principales: Wittkower, D. E., Selinger, Evan, Rush, Lucinda
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Philosophy Documentation Center Spring2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Philosophers of technology are not playing the public role that our own theoretical perspectives motivate us to take. A great variety of theories and perspectives within philosophy of technology, including those of Marcuse, Feenberg, Borgmann, Ihde, Michelfelder, Bush, Winner, Latour, and Verbeek, either support or directly call for various sorts of intervention--a call that we have failed to heed adequately. Barriers to such intervention are discussed, and three proposals for reform are advanced: (1) post-publication peer-reviewed reprinting of public philosophy, (2) increased emphasis on true open access publication, and (3) increased efforts to publicize and adapt traditional academic research.