Public Philosophy of Technology: Motivations, Barriers, and Reforms.

Philosophers of technology are not playing the public role that our own theoretical perspectives motivate us to take. A great variety of theories and perspectives within philosophy of technology, including those of Marcuse, Feenberg, Borgmann, Ihde, Michelfelder, Bush, Winner, Latour, and Verbeek, e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 179 - 201
Main Authors: Wittkower, D. E., Selinger, Evan, Rush, Lucinda
Format: Article
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center Spring2013
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Philosophers of technology are not playing the public role that our own theoretical perspectives motivate us to take. A great variety of theories and perspectives within philosophy of technology, including those of Marcuse, Feenberg, Borgmann, Ihde, Michelfelder, Bush, Winner, Latour, and Verbeek, either support or directly call for various sorts of intervention--a call that we have failed to heed adequately. Barriers to such intervention are discussed, and three proposals for reform are advanced: (1) post-publication peer-reviewed reprinting of public philosophy, (2) increased emphasis on true open access publication, and (3) increased efforts to publicize and adapt traditional academic research.