Axiomatic design theory for the analysis, comparison, and redesign of curriculum for special education.
This paper explores a novel approach to instructional planning using the axiomatic design theory to create an optimized curriculum. First, an existing piece of curriculum is analyzed by axiomatic design approach and design matrices are made to check whether the independence axiom is satisfied or not...
| Publicado en: | Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Vol. 3; no. 6; pp. 309 - 315 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov2008
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105638074&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105638074 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17483107 1X04 jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology issn: 17483107 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2008 vid: 3 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 105638074 105638074 2010178778 10.1080/17483100802281012 NLM19117191 105638074 ppf: 309 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Axiomatic design theory for the analysis, comparison, and redesign of curriculum for special education. aug: au: Wettasinghe CM Koh TH affil: Centre for IT in Education, Nanyang Walk, Singapore. marissa.w@nie.edu.sg sug: subj: Curriculum Development Education, Special Models, Theoretical Conceptual Framework Decision Making Goals and Objectives Learning Methods Teaching Methods ab: This paper explores a novel approach to instructional planning using the axiomatic design theory to create an optimized curriculum. First, an existing piece of curriculum is analyzed by axiomatic design approach and design matrices are made to check whether the independence axiom is satisfied or not. Second, functional requirements (FRs) are derived from the FRs of the existing curriculums developed through conventional methods. Constraints (Cs) are defined considering the time and subject. Design parameters (DPs) are conceived in physical domain to satisfy these specified FRs and Cs, and two alternative DPs for one FR are proposed. One of these alternatives having the least information content is selected by defining FRs as the minimization of the irrelevant subjects/topics and time. Also feasibility is estimated by comparing the information content of the redesigned curriculum with that of other curriculums in consideration of costs-involved, time, and subjects-relevance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|