Knowledge-How, Abilities, and Questions.

The debate about the nature of knowledge-how is standardly thought to be divided between intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of propositional knowledge, and anti-intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of ability. In this paper, I explore a compromise po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 97; no. 1; pp. 86 - 105
Autor principal: Habgood-Coote, Joshua
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=135800831&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 135800831
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00048402
        BHK
      jtl: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 00048402
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2019
      vid: 97
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        135800831
        10.1080/00048402.2018.1434550
      ppf: 86
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 571KB
      tig:
        atl: Knowledge-How, Abilities, and Questions.
      aug:
        au: Habgood-Coote, Joshua
        affil: University of Bristol
      su:
        Anti-intellectualism
        Debate
        Theory of knowledge
        Semantics
        Speech act theory (Communication)
      sug:
        subj:
          Anti-intellectualism
          Debate
          Theory of knowledge
          Semantics
          Speech act theory (Communication)
      keyword:
        anti-intellectualism
        intellectualism
        know-how
        knowledge-how
        knowledge-wh
        practical knowledge
      ab: The debate about the nature of knowledge-how is standardly thought to be divided between intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of propositional knowledge, and anti-intellectualist views, which take knowledge-how to be a kind of ability. In this paper, I explore a compromise position—the interrogative capacity view—which claims that knowing how to do something is a certain kind of ability to generate answers to the question of how to do it. This view combines the intellectualist thesis that knowledge-how is a relation to a set of propositions with the anti-intellectualist thesis that knowledge-how is a kind of ability. I argue that this view combines the positive features of both intellectualism and anti-intellectualism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Australasian Journal of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N