Trajectories of Evidence Based Treatment for School Children with Autism: What's the Right Level for the Implementation?

Evidence-based practices (EBP) for children with autism are under-used in special-education schools. No research compared child-level versus teacher-level influences on EBP use, which could guide implementation strategies. We derived longitudinal profiles of EBP receipt by children (N = 234) in 69 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 881 - 893
Autores principales: Lushin, Victor, Mandell, David, Beidas, Rinad, Marcus, Steven, Nuske, Heather, Kaploun, Victor, Seidman, Max, Gaston, Daphney, Locke, Jill
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Evidence-based practices (EBP) for children with autism are under-used in special-education schools. No research compared child-level versus teacher-level influences on EBP use, which could guide implementation strategies. We derived longitudinal profiles of EBP receipt by children (N = 234) in 69 autism-support classrooms, over an academic year. We compared overall impacts of child-level and teacher-level factors on profile membership. Most children received little EBP throughout the year; however substantial subgroups received increasing, and decreasing, doses of EBP. Child-level and teacher-level factors contributed about equally to profile membership. Children's autism symptoms and verbal ability, teachers' EBP skills, training/experience, classroom support, class size, and implementation leadership climate predicted profile membership. Early identification of treatment profiles could facilitate targeted implementation strategies increasing EBP use.