Scheduling Math Practice: Students' Underappreciation of Spacing and Interleaving.

Many randomized controlled experiments in the classroom have found that mathematics learning is improved dramatically when practice problems of one kind are distributed across multiple assignments (spaced) and mixed with other kinds of problems (interleaved). In two studies, we investigated students...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 100 - 114
Autores principales: Hartwig, Marissa K., Rohrer, Doug, Dedrick, Robert F.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Mar2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Many randomized controlled experiments in the classroom have found that mathematics learning is improved dramatically when practice problems of one kind are distributed across multiple assignments (spaced) and mixed with other kinds of problems (interleaved). In two studies, we investigated students' knowledge of spacing and interleaving. In Study 1, 193 undergraduates designed learning schedules for a hypothetical math class. In Study 2, 175 undergraduates selected from among five hypothetical schedules in response to a variety of questions, provided reasons for their selections, and rated the utility of spacing and interleaving. In both studies, most participants incorrectly judged schedules with minimal degrees of spacing and interleaving to be most effective. Also, schedules with more spacing and interleaving were perceived as more difficult, less enjoyable, and less common. Participants' ratings of utility revealed mixed perspectives on spacing and an underappreciation of interleaving. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that most students fail to recognize the benefits of spaced and interleaved practice. Further, by identifying specific ways in which their beliefs about spacing and interleaving fall short, we reveal opportunities to reshape students' beliefs to foster these effective learning techniques. Public Significance Statement: Many studies have shown that spacing (i.e., distributed practice of the same concept across time) and interleaving (i.e., practicing a mix of concepts within a study session) are highly effective learning techniques. The studies reported here examined college students' beliefs about these techniques in the context of math learning—a familiar domain in which these techniques are highly effective and easy to implement. Even in this context, we found that most college students did not grasp the benefits of spacing or interleaving. We also identified specific errors and gaps in their beliefs, thereby revealing opportunities to correct their beliefs and encourage them to utilize these highly effective learning techniques.