Scheduling Math Practice: Students' Underappreciation of Spacing and Interleaving.
Many randomized controlled experiments in the classroom have found that mathematics learning is improved dramatically when practice problems of one kind are distributed across multiple assignments (spaced) and mixed with other kinds of problems (interleaved). In two studies, we investigated students...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 100 - 114 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Mar2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=161853761&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 161853761 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1076898X 6QS jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied issn: 1076898X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2022 vid: 28 iid: 1 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 161853761 10.1037/xap0000391 ppf: 100 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Scheduling Math Practice: Students' Underappreciation of Spacing and Interleaving. aug: au: Hartwig, Marissa K. Rohrer, Doug Dedrick, Robert F. affil: Department of Psychology, University of South Florida Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of South Florida su: College students Undergraduates Mathematics students Scheduling sug: subj: College students Undergraduates Mathematics students Scheduling keyword: beliefs interleaving math scheduling spacing beliefs interleaving math scheduling spacing ab: Many randomized controlled experiments in the classroom have found that mathematics learning is improved dramatically when practice problems of one kind are distributed across multiple assignments (spaced) and mixed with other kinds of problems (interleaved). In two studies, we investigated students' knowledge of spacing and interleaving. In Study 1, 193 undergraduates designed learning schedules for a hypothetical math class. In Study 2, 175 undergraduates selected from among five hypothetical schedules in response to a variety of questions, provided reasons for their selections, and rated the utility of spacing and interleaving. In both studies, most participants incorrectly judged schedules with minimal degrees of spacing and interleaving to be most effective. Also, schedules with more spacing and interleaving were perceived as more difficult, less enjoyable, and less common. Participants' ratings of utility revealed mixed perspectives on spacing and an underappreciation of interleaving. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that most students fail to recognize the benefits of spaced and interleaved practice. Further, by identifying specific ways in which their beliefs about spacing and interleaving fall short, we reveal opportunities to reshape students' beliefs to foster these effective learning techniques. Public Significance Statement: Many studies have shown that spacing (i.e., distributed practice of the same concept across time) and interleaving (i.e., practicing a mix of concepts within a study session) are highly effective learning techniques. The studies reported here examined college students' beliefs about these techniques in the context of math learning—a familiar domain in which these techniques are highly effective and easy to implement. Even in this context, we found that most college students did not grasp the benefits of spacing or interleaving. We also identified specific errors and gaps in their beliefs, thereby revealing opportunities to correct their beliefs and encourage them to utilize these highly effective learning techniques. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|