In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools.

Explaining new ideas to oneself can promote learning and transfer, but questions remain about how to maximize the pedagogical value of self-explanations. This study investigated how type of instruction affected self-explanation quality and subsequent learning outcomes for second- through fifth-grade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 1 - 22
Autores principales: Matthews, Percival, Rittle-Johnson, Bethany
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. September 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508085391&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508085391
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00220965
        JEX
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
      issn: 00220965
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2009
      vid: 104
      iid: 1
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508085391
        10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.004
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 21
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools.
      aug:
        au:
          Matthews, Percival
          Rittle-Johnson, Bethany
      su:
        Mathematics education
        Self-perception
        Concept learning
      sug:
        subj:
          Mathematics education
          Self-perception
          Concept learning
      ab: Explaining new ideas to oneself can promote learning and transfer, but questions remain about how to maximize the pedagogical value of self-explanations. This study investigated how type of instruction affected self-explanation quality and subsequent learning outcomes for second- through fifth-grade children learning to solve mathematical equivalence problems (e.g., 7+3+9=7+_). Experiment 1 varied whether instruction was conceptual or procedural in nature (n=40), and Experiment 2 varied whether children were prompted to self-explain after conceptual instruction (n=48). Conceptual instruction led to higher quality explanations, greater conceptual knowledge, and similar procedural knowledge compared with procedural instruction. No effect was found for self-explanation prompts. Conceptual instruction can be more efficient than procedural instruction and may make self-explanation prompts unnecessary. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N